Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
General Forums
General Chat Area
climate change is natural?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="malcyorks" data-source="post: 555629" data-attributes="member: 37367"><p>Hi all</p><p></p><p>The real problem all scientists have is a suitable sample size for assessment. Whether you are for or against climate change science you need an appropriate sample size to be accurate. </p><p></p><p>300 years of data just isn’t sufficient to prove conclusively that climate change is happening and is man made. </p><p></p><p>Did anyone watch the Christmas lectures on channel four many years ago?</p><p></p><p>Scientists then used ice core samples that went back 100s of thousands of years to analyse trapped air bubble samples and proved that during some periods the CO2 content was much higher than it is today ( I believe the figure was as high as 3%)?</p><p></p><p>I’m not on either side when it comes to this subject. </p><p></p><p>Even Brian Cox was very careful when answering this question during an interview when he stated that the CONSENSUS of the majority of scientists agreed it was happening. </p><p></p><p>CONSENSUS isn’t science.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="malcyorks, post: 555629, member: 37367"] Hi all The real problem all scientists have is a suitable sample size for assessment. Whether you are for or against climate change science you need an appropriate sample size to be accurate. 300 years of data just isn’t sufficient to prove conclusively that climate change is happening and is man made. Did anyone watch the Christmas lectures on channel four many years ago? Scientists then used ice core samples that went back 100s of thousands of years to analyse trapped air bubble samples and proved that during some periods the CO2 content was much higher than it is today ( I believe the figure was as high as 3%)? I’m not on either side when it comes to this subject. Even Brian Cox was very careful when answering this question during an interview when he stated that the CONSENSUS of the majority of scientists agreed it was happening. CONSENSUS isn’t science. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
General Forums
General Chat Area
climate change is natural?
Top