Neutral earth fault

Talk Electrician Forum

Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

middle age spark

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Hi all,

What's the concensus on these faults, serious or not,would you remove the affected circuit from the rcbo & replace it with a retro fit mcb.

I work with a electrician who keeps doing this on call & it's driving me mad I keep telling him he has to isolate the affected leg &leave the rcbo in place for additional protection but he continues to ignore my advice.

What regulation is he breaking,I've got the electricity at work act as one

I've looked at the regs book but can't find anything which will back me up.

 
Potentially very dangerous indeed.

I've come across cases where a neutral/Earth fault existed and the neutral tail was disconnected from the meter, resulting in the entire installation's load returning through the neutral/Earth fault on a 1.5mm^2 cable causing melting and arcing and a real and immediate fire hazard.

 
Is this a serious question or a wind up?

My first thought would be an offence under H&SAW for interfering with equipment provided for safety in removing the RCBO.

 
Potentially very dangerous indeed.

I've come across cases where a neutral/Earth fault existed and the neutral tail was disconnected from the meter, resulting in the entire installation's load returning through the neutral/Earth fault on a 1.5mm^2 cable causing melting and arcing and a real and immediate fire hazard.
Ive been to two fires caused by n-e faults thats why i know how serious it is but im after regs,ive only got elec at work compliance,ive spoken to the nic & they said thats enough but i want reg no aswell

 
A N→E fault is as equally as dangerous as any other fault that can cause overheating due to overload. A SP RCBO can’t clear a N→E fault leaving the fault able to cause mayhem.

A SP+SwN or DP RCBO will clear a N→E fault. I haven’t seen the 18th yet but I was hoping this issue would have been addressed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ive been to two fires caused by n-e faults thats why i know how serious it is but im after regs,ive only got elec at work compliance,ive spoken to the nic & they said thats enough but i want reg no aswell


I would have thought to trip a 30ma RCD you must be talking of 7666ohms or less with respect to earth. So how is you installation complying with its minimum insulation resistance values as per 612.3.2.  And how come you seem to have forgotten the basic tests to verify the integrity of a circuit?   (don't forget the definitions of a live part includes the neutral conductor, and it should be treated no differently to any other live part)

Doc H.   

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all,

What's the concensus on these faults, serious or not,would you remove the affected circuit from the rcbo & replace it with a retro fit mcb.

I work with a electrician who keeps doing this on call & it's driving me mad I keep telling him he has to isolate the affected leg &leave the rcbo in place for additional protection but he continues to ignore my advice.

What regulation is he breaking,I've got the electricity at work act as one

I've looked at the regs book but can't find anything which will back me up.


Concensus  erm……….?

Any faults...  Fix the fault, return installation back to full operation with correct overload and shock protection as needed by BS7671.

or...………..

1/  If you are his superior/manager/boss...  deal with it!

2/   If he is your superior/manager/boss...  report your concerns via the appropriate channels....

Let them sort it, as it is their responsibility and liability if anything goes pear-shaped!!

What other options are there, to concensus about??

:popcorn

 
Thanks for the replies i know what I'm dealing with at the moment & it's being done but I can't find bs7671 regs to throw in the mix for when I get a recall to come back to the meeting..any ideas will be appreciated. 

 
I doubt you will find anything specific in BS7671 as it is too generic for this scenario.

You could use several parts of Chapter 13 as this cover general rules such as good workmanship.   Andy has already mentioned 134.1.1.

Also look a design, 132, as he has gone against the installation design without consulting the designer.

132.16 additions and alterations to an installation.

133.4 prevention of harmful effects refers to chapter 33 for examples.

If he has not reported his alterations on a certificate you could also refer to chapter 63.

 
Top