Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
Exposed external wiring
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="datadiffusion" data-source="post: 442454" data-attributes="member: 28748"><p>Just as a point of practice, am I right in thinking that until certain, fairly recent editions (perhaps 15?) T+E on a catenery <em>was </em>allowed</p><p></p><p>providing the catenery wire was earthed (ha ha ROFL, big cash prizes if you ever find one).</p><p></p><p>I remember it being used as an example of allowable 'like for like' replacements when Part P came in.</p><p></p><p>It's always seemed like a rubbish method of getting power somewhere to me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="datadiffusion, post: 442454, member: 28748"] Just as a point of practice, am I right in thinking that until certain, fairly recent editions (perhaps 15?) T+E on a catenery [I]was [/I]allowed providing the catenery wire was earthed (ha ha ROFL, big cash prizes if you ever find one). I remember it being used as an example of allowable 'like for like' replacements when Part P came in. It's always seemed like a rubbish method of getting power somewhere to me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Question & Answer Forum
Exposed external wiring
Top