Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
GN3 - 18th Ed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fleeting" data-source="post: 508900" data-attributes="member: 33702"><p>That's a good question as I feel the current definition is a bit non-committal. There are many things you can plonk into Code 3 as they are not going to cause an imminent danger and probably never will. I have just finished a Report with several C3s one being the main protective bond to the water service is cable-tied to the pipework. To me this is a departure from the Regulations so it shouldn't be a recommendation you should be required to rectify it and I could cite many others. I preferred the old Catergory system and to me Code 1 and 2 are too akin to each other, there is little difference. </p><p></p><p></p><p>There is no Requirement to state a Regulation number as it means nothing to the client generally but the departure should have an accurate definition in the Report.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fleeting, post: 508900, member: 33702"] That's a good question as I feel the current definition is a bit non-committal. There are many things you can plonk into Code 3 as they are not going to cause an imminent danger and probably never will. I have just finished a Report with several C3s one being the main protective bond to the water service is cable-tied to the pipework. To me this is a departure from the Regulations so it shouldn't be a recommendation you should be required to rectify it and I could cite many others. I preferred the old Catergory system and to me Code 1 and 2 are too akin to each other, there is little difference. There is no Requirement to state a Regulation number as it means nothing to the client generally but the departure should have an accurate definition in the Report. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Electrical Inspection & Testing Forum
GN3 - 18th Ed
Top