Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Main Forums
Electrician Talk Forum
Interpretation and application to attain compliance with wiring regs.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kme" data-source="post: 184471" data-attributes="member: 113"><p>Binky: I <em>think</em> PC was complaining about the lack of that option in SL`s poll, thou I could be sooooooooooooooooooo wrong :coat </p><p></p><p>ADS: I understand your concern, and agree completely about ignoring a reg because it isn`t "convenient" to adhere to it.</p><p></p><p>But I believe that those who know their way abound the BRB are the ones who will be showing an interest in this thread - the "wannabes" (no offence intended) who`ve retrained (for want of a better word) in a short space of time - many of them don`t adhere to the regs period (a la Steptoe`s LL post). Many don`t worry about the finer nuances of a reg, because they don`t worry about a reg at all.</p><p></p><p>I think those who do have the capability to post intelligently on this subject will do so - others will simply ignore it. The thread does allow us to see how some members perceive 7671, and its application.</p><p></p><p>Choosing to alter the "standard" perception of a reg`s definition <em>shouldn`t</em> be undertaken lightly - you are effectively saying that, in those particular circumstances, YOUR knowledge &amp; experience are better than 7671 is - you`d better be ready to prove that one day!</p><p></p><p>n.b. I DID say that departures from a reg should be noted, along with the reason if considered necessary.</p><p></p><p>KME</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kme, post: 184471, member: 113"] Binky: I [I]think[/I] PC was complaining about the lack of that option in SL`s poll, thou I could be sooooooooooooooooooo wrong :coat ADS: I understand your concern, and agree completely about ignoring a reg because it isn`t "convenient" to adhere to it. But I believe that those who know their way abound the BRB are the ones who will be showing an interest in this thread - the "wannabes" (no offence intended) who`ve retrained (for want of a better word) in a short space of time - many of them don`t adhere to the regs period (a la Steptoe`s LL post). Many don`t worry about the finer nuances of a reg, because they don`t worry about a reg at all. I think those who do have the capability to post intelligently on this subject will do so - others will simply ignore it. The thread does allow us to see how some members perceive 7671, and its application. Choosing to alter the "standard" perception of a reg`s definition [I]shouldn`t[/I] be undertaken lightly - you are effectively saying that, in those particular circumstances, YOUR knowledge & experience are better than 7671 is - you`d better be ready to prove that one day! n.b. I DID say that departures from a reg should be noted, along with the reason if considered necessary. KME [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Main Forums
Electrician Talk Forum
Interpretation and application to attain compliance with wiring regs.
Top