Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
General Forums
General Chat Area
The Niceic Group, And Todays "april Fools" Joke......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Talk Electrician Forum:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="binky" data-source="post: 391220" data-attributes="member: 490"><p>as a former Quality Engineer I'll explain a few points:-</p><p></p><p>prior to ISO 9001 / 2000 Qe systems where there to control and no more. You set up procedures and document that they are followed in the vain hope that everyone knows what they are doing and the product is made / provided correctly. Now this was recognised as time consuming and not adding value to the business.</p><p></p><p>In 2000 it was decided to change the above to reduce emphasis on control and include 'feedback loops' If run correctly this sets a standardised process for continuous improvement of the business (ie learning by your mistakes and actioning improvements, as well as taking improvment ideas from staff members). The idea being that the paperwork shuffling results in adding real value to the business. Now for medium to large companies this is probably good stuff. For MCS I'm suppossed to run this sort of system, but it reality I have a staff of 6, I don't need formalised procedures to improve my business, so its more annoyance to me than use. However I am starting to find that regular feedback meetings do actually help even with a staff of just 6 employees.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="binky, post: 391220, member: 490"] as a former Quality Engineer I'll explain a few points:- prior to ISO 9001 / 2000 Qe systems where there to control and no more. You set up procedures and document that they are followed in the vain hope that everyone knows what they are doing and the product is made / provided correctly. Now this was recognised as time consuming and not adding value to the business. In 2000 it was decided to change the above to reduce emphasis on control and include 'feedback loops' If run correctly this sets a standardised process for continuous improvement of the business (ie learning by your mistakes and actioning improvements, as well as taking improvment ideas from staff members). The idea being that the paperwork shuffling results in adding real value to the business. Now for medium to large companies this is probably good stuff. For MCS I'm suppossed to run this sort of system, but it reality I have a staff of 6, I don't need formalised procedures to improve my business, so its more annoyance to me than use. However I am starting to find that regular feedback meetings do actually help even with a staff of just 6 employees. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
General Forums
General Chat Area
The Niceic Group, And Todays "april Fools" Joke......
Top