ISSWWW
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2009
- Messages
- 699
- Reaction score
- 0
I do some PIR work on large installs were it is often a limitation to power down to IR test, these meters are invaluable as an indication, faults can be localised by methodically testing along the cables to find any problem, I can also see how they can help to identify faulty appliances by showing lower imbalances than that of other type of meters, once you use them the more often you find you actually do use them.I voted Di-Log too. There's no way I can justify spending some of those amounts on a meter that will be used occasionally. The DiLog looks like it could be a valuable aid in fault finding at a very reasonable price. If I were engaged in fault finding on a more regular basis then I dare say my answer would be different, but I'm not.
More than likely, the Fluke; though the Chauvin isn`t too slouchy on spec. The Amprobe seems like a clever piece of kit; but I wouldn`t use / need most of the functionality, TBH - back to my comment about "niches".KME,Spill the beans, which one if cost was not such an issue?...
As soon as i feel the poll has run its course i will get a qty deal on the winner and maybe one other, thanks for all the comments and votes so far, already looks interesting.:worshipWill need to look at the specs Mark, definitely interested though.What's your timescale?
Thanks for this mate, also thank you very much for the http://isswww.co.uk/ reference in your signature, I'm sure you know how helpfull this is:Salute:worship:ApplaudVoted for the Di-Log, at that price its one you cannot afford to buy and useHave the fluke myself though
+1Hi Megger Mark,what sort of deal can you offer for the DILOG 6507 Clamp meter ???
cheers rob
Enter your email address to join: