Recent content by widdler

Sad the hear this news. Tony was one of those contributors that I would always search for in the longer threads as I knew it would be worth finding out his opinions amongst the masses every time. 🙏

+1 for the advice already given.

Nothing is changing. Part P is being re-modelled, but this won't impact the EICR in any way.

I exhibited at Harrogate this year, and popped into Sandown last week as a visitor. I would have to say that Harrogate was bigger and better.

That's incredibly poor.

The volt drop is obtained with the design current (Ib) whilst the adiabatic is for protective conductor sizing and so will be for fault currents of negligible impedance - in other words the volt drop doesn't affect it, as long as the Zs (which does incorporate the length) is low enough to...

Hello there. Been a member for a while, thought I would say hey.

The time limit is there as a centre guide. The true limit of the assessment is down to the discretion of the assessor. I had a C&G EV come and inspect me when assessing the 2391 and I had a delegate who was approaching the 3 hour mark. I explained that the guy was carrying out his work in...

I'm doing it but I won't be revising or anything.

I'd have to agree with that, it appears to be what the question is asking for. Should the resistance value between to accessible conductive parts exceed 0.25 ohms then the touch voltage present would exceed 50 Volts and of course this is not acceptable, therefore supplementary bonding would...