Murdoch 535 Report post Posted February 1 https://www.niceic.com/elecsa As Napit have bought Stroma, it seems any "competition" in the market has been stifled and our yearly subscriptions are not going to get any cheaper 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boltonsparky 68 Report post Posted February 1 I saw this today from another source that also mentioned another body called Blueflame but not sure who they are/owned by. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UNG 80 Report post Posted February 1 All part of the NIC quest for total control, how long before they buy up NAPIT 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Murdoch 535 Report post Posted February 1 53 minutes ago, boltonsparky said: I saw this today from another source that also mentioned another body called Blueflame but not sure who they are/owned by. Never heard of them! https://www.blueflamecertification.com/about/Competent-Person-Scheme/ 8 minutes ago, UNG said: All part of the NIC quest for total control, how long before they buy up NAPIT As long as its not in the next 4 years who cares 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boltonsparky 68 Report post Posted February 1 They're the cheapest by quite a way, bit worrying that they stop site visits after 3 years, but lets be honest whatever scheme you're with you pays your money you gets your membership pretty much regardless. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Murdoch 535 Report post Posted February 2 9 hours ago, boltonsparky said: They're the cheapest by quite a way, bit worrying that they stop site visits after 3 years, but lets be honest whatever scheme you're with you pays your money you gets your membership pretty much regardless. Problem for well established sparks is that the assessors don't know as much as them and the whole assessment process is a pointless waste of time - especially with assessors making up regs as they go along. I just need to do the Part P bit easily and simply ........ can't think of when I last consulted a technical line The schemes do nothing to improve safety and do equally less to push back against the unnecessary petty changes of the regs. and then there is "code breakers" which people think are gospel rules but aren't 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites